| Athlete |
Program |
Benchmark and protocol |
Baseline |
Current |
Change |
Coach note |
Next step |
Re-test |
| [Name] |
[Program] |
10-yard split; same surface and timing method |
[Value] |
[Value] |
[Value] |
[One observation] |
[One priority] |
[Date] |
For each benchmark, define:
- The exact name and coaching purpose
- The protocol, equipment, and unit
- The baseline and target
- The coach responsible for the test
- The re-test date
- The action the result could change
If the result will not affect the next coaching decision or help the athlete understand progress, it probably does not belong on the scorecard.
Give the next coach a starting point
A benchmark tells the next coach what changed. A useful note tells them what to do with that information.
In Brandon's demonstration, the fictional athlete Marcus records catch-and-shoot results of 11 makes from 25 attempts, then 14, then 17 across three dated tests. Those numbers are example records used to explain the workflow. They are not evidence of a real athlete's improvement.
The coaching decision comes from the observation beside the latest result: Marcus is still dropping his elbow on shots from the left wing, while his right-wing technique looks good. The next coach can plan work around the left wing instead of starting with another general assessment.
Use this note format to make that handoff repeatable:
| Field |
Example from the demonstration, organized for a handoff |
| Date and coach |
September 16 — Dana |
| Benchmark |
Catch-and-shoot: 17 makes from 25 attempts |
| Observation |
Elbow drops on the left wing; right wing looks good |
| Next-session focus |
Work on the left-wing catch-and-shoot technique |
This is a suggested writing format. Coaches enter the date, name, result, and plan; the format does not depend on automatic coach attribution or a built-in handoff template.
Keep each benchmark in its own clearly labeled field and add the session context to the athlete's record. Before another coach takes the session, they should be able to answer three questions:
- What was the latest result, and when was it recorded?
- What did the previous coach notice?
- What should this session focus on?
Start with the few benchmarks your staff can record consistently. Brandon recommends a small set in the video; the goal is a shared habit your coaches can maintain. Agree on the test setup, units, and scoring method before comparing results across coaches.
When you send a parent recap, connect the number to the coaching decision: what changed, what still needs work, and what comes next. Use the facility's athlete communication workflow so that explanation stays available when another coach continues the conversation.
Make the workflow survive a busy facility schedule
Use a one-minute post-Session note
Give every coach the same three-line pattern: Changed, Needs work, Next. If the note takes more than a minute or two, it will not survive a busy evening schedule.
Assign one weekly record audit
Once a week, a lead coach or facility manager should check whether notes were added, benchmark names stayed consistent, and upcoming re-tests have owners. This is a quick quality check, not a second performance review.
Set the review cadence in advance
Every four to six weeks is a useful starting point for many development Programs, but it is not a universal rule. Match the cadence to the athlete's age, sport, training phase, Program length, and the reliability of the benchmark. Put the next review date on the scorecard when the baseline is recorded.
Turn the evidence into an athlete progress report
Data the athlete never sees cannot help them understand their development. Send a short recap monthly or at the end of a training block.
A practical progress report includes:
- Starting point: Two or three baseline values
- Current result: The same tests under the same conditions
- Coach's read: One paragraph explaining what changed
- Video evidence: One or two comparable clips
- Next block: The focus for the next four to six weeks
- Next test date: When the athlete will measure again
Use this copyable structure:
This block's focus: First-step acceleration
Baseline: 10-yard split — [value] on [date]
Current: 10-yard split — [value] on [date]
What changed: [One or two sentences]
Next focus: [One clear coaching priority]
Re-test: [Date]
Send the recap through the place the athlete or parent already uses for training. CoachIQ's Inbox keeps the conversation with the business, while the Athlete Portal gives families access to messages, Programs, Sessions, and account information.
For the broader communication setup, see the guide to coach-athlete communication.
What to look for in athlete progress tracking software
Use this checklist when comparing tools:
| Capability |
Question to ask |
| Shared athlete record |
Can every authorized coach see the same history and current information? |
| Flexible data capture |
Can the facility define its own fields, forms, and notes? |
| Session context |
Are bookings, attendance, and coaching notes connected to the athlete? |
| Program tracking |
Can staff review completion, responses, and athlete uploads? |
| Video feedback |
Can coaches annotate footage and deliver it without a separate text thread? |
| Athlete-facing delivery |
Can athletes, parents, and guardians find the recap later? |
| Export and ownership |
Can the facility keep its records if its process or software changes? |